CHICAGO - TelAve -- For 28 years the end goal for SuperHub.com has always been one of global inclusion. Conceptually this has always included a large silo that housed an efficient, cross-border fusion of Retail and Social. This focus goes back decades to before Google existed.

But there's a new monster in town and they were interested in the hub.

Project Manager Tal Newhart reports, "We were approached by a large Asian developer with a tarnished brand. Their comprehensive strategy was to use outward facing SuperHub.com to combine a developing AI effort, along with widely established retail and social platforms, which they control, to further expand globally. The end thinking  was to use the easy to understand simple English of SuperHub.com, a clean/blank brand, to spruce up their optics and use it for wide-area (read global) data capture and likely leading to sponsored surveillance. Functionally SuperHub.com would become a border-less AI training silo using owned data from unsuspecting retail and social users.

More on TelAve News

• Robert Fabbio Inducted into the Austin Technology Council Hall of Fame
• Cybersecurity is Protecting Your Personal Information and Your Portfolio
• L2 Aviation Celebrates Grand Opening of New Facility at Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport (CVG)
• Managing Summer Staffing Surges with Confidence: Why Name Badges Are a Must for Seasonal Success
• Visa Named Title Sponsor of Ascending Athletes' Business Owners Summits for NFL Entrepreneurs

Initially the non-trivial offer was enticing. Unfortunately, both the potential buyer's AI, social and retail teams (all smart and experienced) expressed zero sensitivity to the substantial environmental impact of their plans. When asked, they claimed extreme efficiency in building their foundation models adding it was "not likely" that they would ever require hyper-scale data centers adding, ominously, "at least in the near term".

This was a bit like standing in a small room with an elephant sitting in the corner and pretending it's not there.

Newhart adds: "Our ownership can never be considered tree-huggers. That said, we do keep a side-eye on environmental issues with a focus on obvious detrimental impacts. And there is nothing particularly green about some flavors of AI.  Although it's not currently as environmentally hostile as Bitcoin, there is no denying developing large foundation AI models will consume power potentially so massive it will require State support to implement, support this group would certainly be granted. The electrical power, especially in the non-build near term, will need to come from somewhere, and that will have a negative supply and cost impact on local populations. Not to mention water supplies: It takes a huge amount of water to cool the required GPUs and water scarcity is a growing worldwide problem.

More on TelAve News

• The Paris Court of International Arbitration Elects Dr. John J. Maalouf as its New President
• Whistleblower Seeks SEC and Shareholder Review of Cogent Communications' 2003 Acquisition of FNSI
• $56.7 Million Announced in Q1 2025 with Revenue Growth and Progress Toward NASDAQ Uplisting for AI Marketing Company: IQSTEL, Inc. Stock Symbol: IQSTD
• SAVVY MINING raised $500 million and launched BTC.XRP.DOGE cloud mining, increasing investors' returns by 30%
• New National Nonprofit Launches to Capture Firsthand Accounts of Adoption Stories

Their counterargument is that the likes of TikTok, WeChat and Instagram are all profligate "energy hogs." Perhaps so. But those platforms run nicely on existing infrastructure and don't require expansion of energy grids to feed the hellaciously hungry AI training beast.

Newhart concluded: "Sometimes you just have to take a pass."